My Thoughts

Posts Tagged ‘YouTube

Let me start this post by paraphrasing what Prem Kumar said in his recent interview,

“When I wanted to make Meiazhagan, people advised me to make it in Malayalam and dub it in Tamizh to make it a success”

The above is the sad reflection of Tamizh audience as well as the content creators right now.

Hiphop Aadi in his interview said that unless Tamizh content creators on social media improve the movie industry will suffer and eventually deteriorate. This is kind of true if you look at the garbage content the people post on YouTube and social media these days. For example the only thing the Tamizh YouTube’ers are interested is their views and subscribers. To gain that they are ready to plunge to any level. The kind of dishonesty I see in our content creators is appalling. I know that there was a phase in Hindi cinema when their content creators resorted to such tactics to increase their subscriber count but again that stemmed out of anger towards their industry but that’s not what is happening in Tamizh.

The biggest issue we have is the lack of ethics from these so called critics and content creators. I am not saying everyone one is like that but the majority are that way. Most of these people are kind of waiting for a bad movie from the industry so that they can milk roasting everyone involved in the film for months but will disappear when a good films comes up. I would like to ask these so called critics who get angered when they are questioned, where are their posts when movies like Madras Matinee or Sirai or Parandhu Po releases? Where do they disappear? For example recently a Tamizh YouTuber took out an interview given by two directors whose films he disliked and created a content to make fun of them using personal attacks.

This is what these people resort to. I agree that people create content on YouTube to make money and having more views and subscribers are essential but again there needs to be some honesty in the content they post. Creating content to appease audience of a certain region seems to be the prime priority of Tamizh YouTubers. The problem though is that the fans are falling for this as well. When the audience and critics don’t praise or promote movies like Madras Matinee, Angammal, Sirai, Paranthu Po etc, they do not have the right to complain about lack of content. This also exposes the hypocrisy of these creators as they keep harping about how bad the content coming from Tamizh cinema is but when something good comes up they have nothing to say. It is as if they are sad that some good film has come and they cannot create a content to attract some trolls to get more views. Some YouTubers are still milking Dude and Coolie to increase their viewership while both those films weren’t that bad in the first place.

The biggest difference between Tamizh content creators and the other South Indian language creators is that they do not get personal about actors or technicians. Yes they criticise the films as well as the actors performances and that’s where they stop. Tamizh media channels and content creators though go an extra step to make everyone believe that it is all doom and gloom in Tamizh cinema which is actually not the case. It is only in Tamizh do we get critics roundtable at the end of the year and no one has any clue about who these people are and what their credentials are. The amount of importance we give to these so called critics is ridiculous. The Tamizh YouTube space is also a testament to the saying that negativity sells. Majority of the YouTube channels create negative content about the industry and they don’t have anything positive to report at most times. All these people somehow disappear when a good film pops up and show up with their content when a movie they consider bad releases.

They also are the masters of making a decent movie into a bad one and they take pride in the same. The audience though need to wake up and not give these so called critics and content creators more attention than they deserve. The industry needs strong voices and audience if we want to see good content coming through from our creators. If movies like Madras Matinee, Paranthu Po, 3BHK or even something like an Aaryan sink without a trace we have no right to complain about good content not being produced from our industry. Yeah it is great that we support and praise Malayalam industry through the roof but again we forget that our industry makes good films as well which needs support.

Good content overall from films as well as creators on social media is essential to improve the overall quality being watched by the audience and right now Tamizh language content on social media is falling way short. While new film makers are doing good work and even films like Aaromaley, Aan Pavam Pollathathu etc are very good, the audience and the critics aren’t lapping those up. Creating false propaganda and showing that the industry is struggling might get their view count and subscriber count up but makes their channel and content unethical.

While these channels expect our film makers to learn from Malayalam cinema, I hope they hear to their own advise as well. Being in the media and on YouTube might give them a bit of license to not follow any of the journalism ethics but again if you want to be a good content creator there needs to be some sort of honesty in the content you produce. Majority of the people in the Tamizh space neither have ethics nor have honesty, so it is hard to take anything they post seriously. This situation needs to change and it squarely depends on the audience who consume such content and to not encourage such trolls who masquerade as content creators. Good content in cinema and on Social media depend on good audience and unless that improves we will not see this situation improve.

The year 2024 began for Tamizh industry with 2 big films release on Pongal. The first one was Dhanush’s Captain Miller and the other was Sivakarthikeyan’s Ayalaan. Both films even though collecting decently at the box office did not impress the critics that much. Following that Tamizh cinema did go through a drought in terms of content and success at the box office. All was not lost though as at the same time we did have movies like Lover and Garudan which were very good.

During that time the Tamizh YouTube content creators had a field day criticising the content and the industry. The one thing they realised as well was that criticising their industry actually got them new fans and subscribers. The constant videos putting down the industry and it’s content and appreciating other industries actually created a new fan base for these creators. The success of Malayalam cinema at the start of the year fueled this change among these creators. We all know how passionate Malayalam cinema fan base is and the Tamizh YouTube content creators took full advantage of that. The fact which was completely ignored during this time was that Tamizh cinema had a great 2023. Even at the end of the year a movie like Parking released to huge critical acclaim but these videos made everyone believe that the industry has been struggling for years.

The same people who posted a video a week to appreciate and promote other industries disappear completely when a good Tamizh cinema releases. This has been a trend and not something new to 2024. Even in the past few years when a good Tamizh content releases these so called experts disappear except for the movie review. There will be no follow up, no appreciation videos etc will be seen from these creators. The second half of the year has been brilliant so far from Tamizh cinema. Starting from the successful Maharaja films like Lubber Pandu, Kottukkali, Meiazhagan, Amaran, Thangalaan, Raayan, Vaazhai etc became critically acclaimed films.

Despite producing such widely accepted content in the second half the narrative of Tamizh cinema struggling is being propagated by these so called experts. Who are these YouTube experts? What is their credentials? Why do we give so much importance to their opinion? These are some questions the audience of these channels need to ask. Anyone who is reporting on something need to have some sort of journalistic ethics. Obviously none of these people have studied journalism have no clue what that means. The major cornerstone of journalism is integrity which many of these people lack. The other most important ethics of journalism is accountability, trust and truthfulness. When we look at these content being posted these days it is just done for the sake of increasing the subscribers count.

If any of these creators had integrity they would have at least posted some appreciation videos later in the year when Tamizh cinema produced some good content. The fact that there are more videos criticising and trolling Kanguva than appreciating a film like Meiazhagan shows the shallowness of these creators. The amount of appreciation videos we see of Meiazhagan, Vaazhai, Lubber Pandu etc from other language creators show how selfish and horrible Tamizh content creators are.

I am not saying don’t appreciate other language films, actually I am saying the opposite. Appreciate good content irrespective of the language and have some integrity when posting content. I agree it takes lots of effort to produce a video, edit it and publish the same and they obviously need subscribers to run a channel but what they are doing right now is unethical. Criticism is important for any industry and if you see content creators from other South Indian languages are harsh on poor content from their industry but none of them go to the extend Tamizh creators go. They don’t put down their industry to appreciate other regions to the level our creators do. Why is that I ask? Is it because we are so insecure that we are afraid of appreciating our industry? Is it because we think if Tamizh cinema is appreciated their subscribers will leave them? I am not completely sure but this needs to stop.

People who are jumping on such creators bandwagon are also to blame including other language fans who actually think these people mean what they post. The fans and creators from other South Indian industries are way ahead of the so called experts from Tamizh. They not only appreciate other industry content but also post a balanced view of their own industry. When Malayalam cinema was doing so well earlier this year we did not see a Telugu YouTuber posting a video attacking their industry nor did we see Kannada content creators doing the same. So why are we doing this is a question we viewers need to ask as well. I don’t mind criticism as not everyone has to like a film. There are a lot of them who did not like Meiazhagan as well which is fine as it is their prerogative but their needs to be some kind of fairness in the content they post on their channels. When you troll or post negative reviews of a film, appreciate good content as well. Don’t just post videos to appease fans from other industries for the sake of subscribers, it just looks bad.

I am not saying everyone is bad, there are a few good ones here and there but again when you have so many poor ones good ones are hard to find. While social media has made it easier for a common man to dabble with journalism the ethics of such a role should still remain valid. While proper journalist and reviewers will refrain from trolling or posting polarising content just to increase subscribers these self proclaimed experts do it only for subscribers. I am a fan of Indian cinema and watch content from all languages if the content interests me. Never have I appreciated an industry just to put down the other, even when talking with my friends. Good content comes from all industries and so do the bad ones. At the end of the year every industry at the maximum will have only 10-15 films which remain in our minds. Even Malayalam industry known for its content cannot buck that trend. No one can say an industry produced 50 great films a year, that is not possible. The fact everyone knows and still we promote and support such creators who make us believe otherwise.

I normally don’t write about such things as I normally don’t care about what people are posting on YouTube or on social media but this one hit me hard. Over the last decade we know that reaction channels have become a thing and they have all kind of become self proclaimed experts on everything. We as an audience don’t question their credentials or their expertise on a subject and just view their videos and put them on a pedestal. The biggest gainers of this wave have been foreign Youtubers. The channels which had hardly any subscribers or views jumped on the Indian bandwagon to increase their popularity.

There have been a lot of them who have propped up recently. There are a few channels who actually give respect to the content they are watching and to the culture of the people whose content they are reacting on but not everyone does that. Recently I saw a reaction of a Tamizh trailer reaction by an American reaction channel. The trailer was of the movie Amaran, a movie which is close to the heart of all the Indians. A story of courage, valor and sacrifice of Major Mukund Varadarajan. I have no issues with people watching something and saying it is not for them or they did not like the content they are watching but to outright make fun of what is happening on the screen is appalling.

Making fun of the person who isn’t alive and his family who went through tremendous pain shows what sort of people we have been supporting. The way they were laughing at Sai Pallavi, who is actually playing the role of the wife of the Major, Indhu Rebecca Varghese was horrible to watch. Knowing very well that this a story about a real life person and about his family and to still make fun of the characters in the movie is a new low. You don’t have to actually be a Army family to understand loss of human life and the impact it creates on the immediate family. One of the reactors says she does not connect to the sentiment as she is not from the region is the most ridiculous comment I have heard in recent times.

The fact of the matter is that all countries have their Military forces and this is a universal story. Even if we cannot resonate with their pain we can all relate to the loss the family faces when they lose a loved one. Here is a story of a wife who lost her husband, a kid who lost her father and parents who lost their son and all you could do is laugh at them? This is poor. I am sorry I have lost all respect to that channel and I at least will not watch any videos from any of them in that panel. I don’t have issues people criticising content of the film based on the making or the story etc but to make fun of characters knowing very well that this is not a work of fiction is something I cannot get past. People need to realise that none of these people have any attachment or connection to our films but just do it because they get lots of views and subscribers. I am not saying everyone is bad, there are very good ones who actually take an effort and these people are not them.

I don’t want to mention their channel or any names here as that is not my intention. When you watch something like that you just can’t look past it which is the reason for my rant.

Interviews are dime a dozen these days on YouTube but again only a few of them are actually watchable. There are so many channels these days on YouTube and on TV that there is some interview either for movie promotions or just a chat with an actor almost everyday. While there are lots of interviews there aren’t many with substance. The interviews mostly at least in Tamizh are boring, unimaginative and sometimes downright embarrassing.

Previously there were a handful of Satellite channels but now there are so many of them that there is always a competition to put up a click bait headline go get views for the video. Most of the interviewers do no homework on the actors career and come up with mundane questions for which we get robotic responses from the actors. Not all interviewers are bad, some of them are brilliant like Baradwaj Rangan, Abishek and Rukshanth to name a few but again there aren’t many.

Here are some of the issues I have about especially Tamizh interviews (I don’t watch other language interviews much to form an opinion on them. Just a disclaimer before someone attacks me)

Too much hero worship:

Most of the times the conversations with famous stars become a ego massaging exercise more than an actual interview. Most of the anchors go overboard with praises which sometimes even make the actors uncomfortable. The interview does not offer anything to the audience who watch it other than to give satisfaction to the fanboys of the stars. Most of the times I do not even watch after the interview after the first few questions as I know how it is going to go.

No research or homework done

Most of the interviews have repetitive questions and we get standard answers from the stars. There is no research or homework done about the movie the actor is promoting or about the career to actually ask meaningful questions. The stars mostly go through the motions and most of these interviews turn into boring one with the anchor trying to fish for some click bait title for the video on YouTube.

Female actors completely ignored in interviews with the movie crew

When we have the movie crew come in to promote a film, the fixation of the anchor on the male star of the film is jarring. The female actors are ignored completely to a point where we can actually see them bored out of their wits. This not only happens with newcomers but also with established actors. The Tamizh anchors are notorious in doing this if you follow movie crew interviews closely. Suddenly they will remember that there is a female actor and resort to some mundane questions like “How did they get a chance to act in this project?” and then, wait for it as this is a brilliant question, “How was it to act with the hero of the film”, once these questions are answered, they will be back to the male stars. This becomes worse for female actors who cannot speak the language. It is not their fault that they cannot speak the language. The fact of the matter is that most of the anchors just don’t bother to do any homework on the female actors careers to actually ask any meaningful questions.

Female actors asked about male stars in their interviews:

This is the worst of all. Even when female stars/actors are interviewed the questions to them will be to share their experiences acting with multiple male superstars. The if they run out of questions about male superstars, they will ask the female actors when they are getting married or what kind of life partner they are looking for etc. These interviews are the most cringe of all. You just cannot sit through it. It is almost like these actors have done nothing in their careers to have a conversation about.

Tamizh anchors need to learn how an interesting interview can be conducted. May be watch videos of a Baradwaj Rangan or Abishek or even someone like Rukhshanth whose recent interviews with couple of female stars were brilliant and fun to watch. The anchors that I mentioned above don’t ask monotonous questions and actually come with proper research about the actors career to ask questions which keeps the celebrity as well as the fans interested.

Yeah praising stars and getting praise out of others about a star for a click bait title might please some fanboys but again that is not all there is for an interview. YouTube channels themselves need to strive hard to give better content to the audience. These days I don’t watch any interviews as they are boring. An actor from a big film will be interviewed but the entire conversation will be about the star in the film and not about the actor who is being interviewed. This needs to change in Tamizh media and channels need to realise that just the ability to talk does not make someone a good anchor.

I grew up predominantly in the 90’s. My early tryst with movie reviews were through newspapers. We lived in Chennai and Hindu’s Friday feature was the only way to get a movie review at least till mid-90’s before satellite TV took over. Even though there were movie reviews in print in the 80’s & 90’s people went to the theatres solely based on either the cast or the director. Tamil cinema is one of the few industries where directors have the same pull as the actors. For example in 70’s & 80’s K Balachander, Mahendran, Balu Mahendra & Barathiraja had their own following and people will flock to theatres just to see their films. Even when movie reviews were prevalent in the print media in the 80’s word of mouth was still the preferred way of people finding out about the quality of a movie.

For example when a Rajini film released no one cared about reviews, you will see people standing in long queues to watch a film. Same with Kamal Hassan and other big stars. Once the first few shows were over, the audience talk will what will decide the fate of a film. Things have changed drastically over the past decade and with the advent of social media reviews are almost instant. While the audience post their reviews on Twitter while watching the film, there are 100’s of YouTube channels reviewing the movies as well. To be frank I have lots of respect for people who have their own YouTube channels. It takes courage to put yourself out there and talk about anything. There are a few creative channels while most of them are either reaction channels or movie review channels.

There are a few professional ones working for famous publications while others who have garnered subscribers through their content. I have no way of knowing credentials of any of these so called “Film experts” by just looking at their content though. It is very important for anyone who is reaching out to a large audience to understand that movie reviews are basically personal opinions. Something the experts these days seem to have forgotten. The popularity of their channel or the subscribers they have seems to have completely gotten to their head which makes for some cringe movie reviews. As a consumer of such reviews, the only thing I want to see is what the reviewer thinks about the film, what he/she likes or dislikes about the movie. I am not there to see some agenda driven rant or the reviewers trying to show off their knowledge of film making. As a common man I care a damn about some of the content of the reviews as it does not matter to me.

Also as a reviewer you need to steer clear of generalising. Everyone has the right to say they don’t like the movie but they cannot be under the illusion that they speak for others. The reason these “experts” have a huge following is because people actually respect their opinions. When that happens it also becomes the responsibility of the reviewers to stay balanced when they review the movies. Using their popularity to further their agenda or someone else’s agenda isn’t very ethical and that is the reason I steer clear of few of these channels these days.

The other irritating part about these YouTube channels is that they go looking for controversy as soon as some update on a movies comes about. A film releases it’s first single or a look or a teaser they immediately go on the streets with a mic and a camera asking people on the streets their review. Reviewing a movie is a tough art and being balanced is even tougher. I have hardly seen a few reviewers who give their opinion and let the audience make a call whether they would like to watch a film. That’s how it should be as trying to influence the audience is not why you review a movie.

The one thing everyone needs to understand is that there is nothing called a perfect film. A movie which is perfect for someone might not be for someone else. A film succeeds because there is something which keeps the viewers entertained throughout its runtime. That is exactly what the audience wants. Most of the reviews these days feel like they come right out of a film school. While it is good to show off your knowledge of film making, I feel that should be in a separate video and not in the review itself.

The biggest disappointment for me though is that while technology wise we have come a long way, the quality of movie critics has fallen in recent times. Things aren’t going to change much as in this age of competition people are ready to present controversial content to gather more views and subscribers. When that is what these channels aim for, you cannot expect them to give quality content to the viewers. The sad part is that the viewers also have gotten used to these substandard and agenda driven reviews that they seem to think that this is the norm. I have stopped watching majority of the review channels and only follow a few who I think try to provide balanced take on a film and leave rest to the viewers.

What do you think about movie reviews these days? Do you think they provide you with balanced views on a film? Or do you think they try to push their agenda on their viewers?

The recently concluded producer’s council elections in Kollywood was laced with lots of controversies. Like the Nadigar Sangam elections actor Vishal was in the midst of the action surrounding the election. This article is not about the elections and let me conclude by saying that Vishal was elected as the president at the end of it all. The topic I wanted to touch was the press conference the new members of the council had after the win. Vishal who is the president requested the online reviewers to postpone their reviews by few days to help the movie industry.

It was an odd request to be frank. In this day and age, asking few YouTube reviewers to postpone their reviews isn’t going to stop people from voicing their opinions on social media. If Vishal and the new members think that things can be returned back to the olden days with the reviews being postponed, they are living in a dreamland. Let us for example take 90’s as a case study. I am not a movie historian and don’t have statistics but from my experience (Since that’s the decade I am more aware of), there weren’t so many movies releasing every week. We used to wait for big festivals like Pongal, Tamil New Year and Diwali to see big star movies. Only during such big festivals we used to see multiple movies release at one go. Now coming back to the current decade, there are 3-4 movies release every week. It is even hard to keep track of what the movies are and who is acting in it.

The producer’s council should first regulate the amount of movies being made and make sure that the movie they are producing has decent content. Releasing 200+ movies in a year is not going to help the industry. Some movies which release are so amateurish that it is hard to sit through. New producers wanting to enter the industry need to be educated as to how to choose a script before investing a huge sum of money. It is always easy place a blame on a soft target such as YouTube reviewers and call them as a reason for decreasing audience in the theatres but the truth is far from it.

Reviews are personal opinions, people are free to express their opinion in any platform they want. They are the people who go and spend money to watch the film. It’s not like all films are ripped apart, movies like Managaram, 8 thottakal, Bahubali, Aandavan Kattalai, Power Pandi, Pizza, NPNK etc. all got overwhelmingly positive responses from the reviewers. This is the age of good content and if the industry is producing mediocre content, they cannot cry about decreasing audience. I am not talking about piracy here, which is for a completely different topic. People are going to look for review before watching films and that is going to continue. No one is going to stop that. Taking a family of four to the theatre is an expensive ordeal. People would want to make sure that the expense is worthwhile. When we go to a store, the first thing we do before buying a product is to look for reviews. If majority of the users of the product have given positive reviews people purchase that product. In the age of digital media, you are never going to fight that.

If the content is good most of the reviews are going to be favourable. People do look at multiple reviews before making a call and if a movie is good not everyone is going to bad mouth a film. The producers need to get together and think about what they are producing and what content is being screened to the public. If you want people to watch films, reduce the number of movies being produced, produce good content, educate new producers to invest smartly and give the films enough time to publicize their content before release. These would some of the solutions to get the audience to the theatres. By asking reviewers to postpone their reviews, you are basically saying that even if the movie is bad, since we invested, let the people spend the money like they did in the 80’s and 90’s before they found out that the content was horrible. Sorry Vishal, that is not a solution and audience are never going to fall for that.